The Birmingham City Council is set to allocate $18 million of the city’s American Rescue Plan funding toward the construction of the city’s Bus Rapid Transit system.
The project, which will create a 10-mile, higher-speed public transit corridor through 25 neighborhoods, broke ground in December. But rising construction costs due to the COVID-19 pandemic had placed significant strain on the project, Charlotte Shaw, the city’s deputy director of capital projects, told the council during a committee of the whole meeting Tuesday.
“This is what’s called ’the perfect storm’ right now for the construction industry,” Shaw said. “Material and supplies and workforce (costs) have escalated tremendously.” That meant that when the city sent out a request for contractors to bid on the project, the lowest bid it received was still $11 million higher than the $45.8 million budgeted for the project. When the city called for bids a second time, it received none.
Shaw said city planners had worked to lower the project’s costs, cutting significant portions, such as a $1.1 million transit signal priority component, which would streamline traffic signal patterns along the BRT corridor. Even with these reductions and factoring in contingency costs, Shaw said the project would need an additional $14 million in funding to move forward.
But councilors argued that they’d rather not make any cuts to the BRT program at all.
“I think it’s important that we don’t spend all of this money to create just another bus service,” District 2 Councilor Hunter Williams said. “We need to be really intentional about making sure this is actually a Bus Rapid Transit service … . Initially, because of the constraints, Mrs. Shaw took out the $1.1 million for traffic lights, which is the ‘rapid’ part of the BRT. I think it’s important that we keep that in. I think it’d be really foolish to spend almost $60 million and not do the project correctly over $1.1 million … . The real backbone of BRT in any city is its ability to be on time, consistent and reliable.”
District 8 Councilor Steven Hoyt went even further, arguing that the council should fund the BRT project “in its entirety.”
“This really says much about who we are as a city and if we do what we say we’re going to do,” Hoyt said. “We need to make sure that we do it and we do it right. … I really don’t think we need to take anything out that we’ve had planned for this project … . When other projects hit snags, we don’t tell them to scale back. We find the money.”
An obvious source, some councilors suggested, was federal American Rescue Plan funding. The city had its first $74 million tranche of relief money in May; another $74 million will follow next May. Though some of that first half already has been allocated to city employees’ premium pay, there’s roughly $53.1 million still to be spent.
A proposal to allocate $18 million to the BRT program will come before the council for a vote next Tuesday. That money will initially come from the city’s general fund balance, which will be replenished by ARP funding later. Though that last point was the subject of some debate, the council eventually voted unanimously to advance the proposal out of committee.
Last month, the council had balked at Mayor Randall Woodfin’s proposed divvying of the remaining ARP funding into several different “buckets” — including, among other categories, $18.75 million for public transportation. Councilors — particularly Williams and Hoyt — had taken issue with that line item, arguing that there had been no specific explanation from Woodfin’s office on how that transit allocation would be spent.
Now, it appears, they have it.